Key Summary
Under Korean law, if a sexual deepfake of you appears in Korea, preserve the image or enough identifying evidence, the URL, account, posting time, and the path by which you discovered it, while avoidi…
On this page
- What does Korean law focus on in this situation? Article 14-2 of the Sexual Crimes Punishment Act covers sexually humiliating fabricated or edited images made against the depicted person’s will, and current law also addresses distribution and certain possession or viewing conduct. A victim should preserve both the fabricated content and the chain showing where it appeared.
- What should you do before a police interview or report? Capture the page and identifiers before reporting or blocking if it is safe. If the content is spreading, make a list of each URL or account rather than repeatedly opening and saving every copy. Ask trusted recipients to preserve the message they received, including sender information and time. Do not publicly repost the deepfake to prove that it exists, because doing so can increase exposure and create additional copies.
- What evidence should be preserved? Online victim evidence should be collected for identification and takedown, not for repeated circulation of the sexual content.
- Which facts can change the legal analysis? The report should distinguish creation, first posting, later reposting, and anonymous circulation rather than treating every copy as one event. 1. How are you identifiable? Face, name, school, workplace, username, or surrounding text may connect the fabrication to you. 2. Where did the first known copy appear? The earliest post may help identify the source and timeline. 3. Who distributed later copies? Reposters may be different from the original creator. 4. What real source material was used? Matching the fabricated image to an original photo can help establish falsification. 5. What ongoing harm is occurring? Record workplace, school, family, safety, or mental-health impact factually and with available records.
- What will police compare with your statement? Deepfake content can be copied quickly across platforms. Preserve the identifiers of each significant copy, but avoid creating a large personal archive of sexual material when URLs and platform records can document the spread. Police and platforms need enough information to find the content; the victim does not need to become the main distributor of the evidence.
- What should a foreigner check about interpretation and the Korean statement? In a sexual-deepfake victim report, make sure interpretation preserves whether you personally saw the conduct or content, learned it from another person, inferred it from circumstances, or have an objective record. Those categories should not be collapsed into a stronger statement than the evidence supports.
- Can a foreign victim report this regardless of nationality or visa concerns? Nationality or limited Korean does not by itself prevent a victim from reporting a sexual-deepfake victim report. Any separate immigration concern should be addressed independently rather than delaying urgent safety steps or preservation of the fabricated image or identifying capture, URL, account, posting time, discovery path, and takedown records.
- What can a Korean criminal lawyer add? A lawyer can prepare the complaint around identifiable posts, accounts, source images, and distribution events; request urgent preservation where appropriate; and keep the victim statement focused on facts that can be verified rather than the impossible task of locating every copy on the internet.
- FAQ Q. Should I download every deepfake copy I find? A. No. Preserve enough content and identifiers to prove and locate the material, but avoid unnecessary repeated downloading or redistribution.
Under Korean law, if a sexual deepfake of you appears in Korea, preserve the image or enough identifying evidence, the URL, account, posting time, and the path by which you discovered it, while avoiding unnecessary re-sharing. Article 14-2 of the Sexual Crimes Punishment Act can apply to covered fabricated sexual material made against the depicted person’s will.
In a sexual-deepfake victim report, evidence preservation should minimize further circulation of sexual material. Preserve enough source information to identify the content, account, and publication path, but avoid repeatedly forwarding or re-uploading the material merely to create more copies.
What does Korean law focus on in this situation? Article 14-2 of the Sexual Crimes Punishment Act covers sexually humiliating fabricated or edited images made against the depicted person’s will, and current law also addresses distribution and certain possession or viewing conduct. A victim should preserve both the fabricated content and the chain showing where it appeared.
A victim should preserve the evidence in a way that identifies the fabricated material, the depicted person, the account that created or distributed it, and the location where it appeared. Do not focus only on downloading the sexual image itself. URLs, usernames, post IDs, dates, surrounding comments, profile links, and reports from people who received the material can be more useful for identifying the source and distribution path.
What should you do before a police interview or report? Capture the page and identifiers before reporting or blocking if it is safe. If the content is spreading, make a list of each URL or account rather than repeatedly opening and saving every copy. Ask trusted recipients to preserve the message they received, including sender information and time. Do not publicly repost the deepfake to prove that it exists, because doing so can increase exposure and create additional copies.
For a sexual-deepfake report, document the earliest page or account where the fabricated image or video appeared, including the URL, username, upload time, search result, and any visible repost chain. A witness can describe what they personally saw, but there is usually no need to send the fabricated sexual content to additional people simply to obtain confirmation.
What evidence should be preserved? Online victim evidence should be collected for identification and takedown, not for repeated circulation of the sexual content.
| Item | Why it matters | How to preserve it |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | - |
| Full-page screenshots | Show the image together with account name, URL, comments, and date | Capture the whole page or screen, not only the cropped sexual image. |
| Post and profile URLs | Allow police or platforms to locate the account and content | Copy URLs and profile IDs into a separate dated list. |
| Messages from recipients | Can prove that the material was sent to specific people | Ask recipients to preserve the original message thread and sender details. |
| Original nonsexual source images | May help show which real photos were used for the fabrication | Keep the earliest original photos and where they were posted. |
| Platform reports and takedown records | Show when the victim requested removal and how the platform responded | Save confirmation emails, ticket numbers, and removal notices. |
For a sexual-deepfake victim report, preserve the fabricated image or identifying capture, URL, account, posting time, discovery path, and takedown records in original form whenever possible. Use separate working copies for translation or annotation so the evidentiary source remains identifiable.
Which facts can change the legal analysis? The report should distinguish creation, first posting, later reposting, and anonymous circulation rather than treating every copy as one event. 1. How are you identifiable? Face, name, school, workplace, username, or surrounding text may connect the fabrication to you. 2. Where did the first known copy appear? The earliest post may help identify the source and timeline. 3. Who distributed later copies? Reposters may be different from the original creator. 4. What real source material was used? Matching the fabricated image to an original photo can help establish falsification. 5. What ongoing harm is occurring? Record workplace, school, family, safety, or mental-health impact factually and with available records.
What will police compare with your statement? Deepfake content can be copied quickly across platforms. Preserve the identifiers of each significant copy, but avoid creating a large personal archive of sexual material when URLs and platform records can document the spread. Police and platforms need enough information to find the content; the victim does not need to become the main distributor of the evidence.
For a sexual-deepfake report, record the exact post or file you personally located and then list any reported mirrors, reposts, or group-chat circulation separately. This keeps the confirmed source distinct from leads that still need platform or witness verification.
What should a foreigner check about interpretation and the Korean statement? In a sexual-deepfake victim report, make sure interpretation preserves whether you personally saw the conduct or content, learned it from another person, inferred it from circumstances, or have an objective record. Those categories should not be collapsed into a stronger statement than the evidence supports.
Before signing the Korean statement in a sexual-deepfake victim report, verify what content you personally saw, where it appeared, how the account was identified, and whether copies were reposted. Distinguish facts you personally know from estimates, inferences, or information learned from someone else.
Can a foreign victim report this regardless of nationality or visa concerns? Nationality or limited Korean does not by itself prevent a victim from reporting a sexual-deepfake victim report. Any separate immigration concern should be addressed independently rather than delaying urgent safety steps or preservation of the fabricated image or identifying capture, URL, account, posting time, discovery path, and takedown records.
What can a Korean criminal lawyer add? A lawyer can prepare the complaint around identifiable posts, accounts, source images, and distribution events; request urgent preservation where appropriate; and keep the victim statement focused on facts that can be verified rather than the impossible task of locating every copy on the internet.
FAQ Q. Should I download every deepfake copy I find? A. No. Preserve enough content and identifiers to prove and locate the material, but avoid unnecessary repeated downloading or redistribution.
Q. Can I report an anonymous account?
A. Yes. Preserve profile URLs, usernames, post IDs, messages, payment clues, and any linked accounts so identification can be investigated.
Q. What if the account deletes the deepfake before police see it?
A. Preserve the URL, account, timestamp, screenshots showing context, and any platform report or witness evidence so the original location can still be investigated.
Q. What should I send before consultation?
A. Send the URLs or account details, preserved images or context screenshots, platform reports, discovery timeline, and any known distributor information.
For a focused review, send the URLs or account details, preserved images or context screenshots, platform reports, discovery timeline, and any known distributor information. Email the materials to dylee@newlawyer.co.kr. English and Chinese consultations are available. This content is general legal information and does not guarantee a particular result.
Already outside Korea and planning to return? If there's an unresolved criminal matter in Korea, it's worth reviewing your situation before you board your flight — a Provisional Retainer (가선임) puts a Korean criminal defense attorney on your case in advance, so counsel is already briefed and ready to respond if you're contacted by police after you arrive.
📧 dylee@newlawyer.co.kr https://koreacriminalattorney.com/en/before-entering-korea-criminal-lawyer
Related guides
Already outside Korea and planning to return?
Don't search for a lawyer after you're arrested at the airport. Have your Korean criminal defense attorney in place before you fly.
Pre-Entry Risk Review →Legal Consultation
Need advice about this issue?
Attorney Doyun Lee, a KBA-certified criminal law specialist, reviews criminal matters directly. Remote representation is available nationwide in Korea.